The
infrastructure industry is very important in fuelling the economy. But when it
comes to such critical issues as pricing, the oil industry is about as
transparent as the crude oil that it processes. The price that we pay for a
litre of petrol has no relation whatsoever to what it costs to produce that for
Oil Company. Before going to the depth of the topic let us first know about
'under-recovery.' Under-recovery is the difference between the price that the
oil company would like to charge for say, petrol, based on its international
traded price, and the price at which it supplies the fuel to pumps, excluding
taxes. Decisions to increase or decrease retail prices of products such as petrol,
diesel and cooking gas are made based on this concept.
It is a common
perception that under recoveries is losses suffered by state run oil marketing companies;
these losses are just 'notional 'and not actually incurred by the companies.
But this is because the Government uses import parity basis to calculate under
recoveries. For example in case of diesel, the fixed selling price of the
diesel is compared to the amount the companies would have paid had they
imported the diesel (this will include international price of diesel, custom
duties, transportation costs and marketing costs and margins). However, the
price thus arrived has nothing to do with the actual cost of producing diesel
which will be lesser (considering domestic over capacity in petroleum products
refining markets). The way whole thing is projected makes one feel that the
Government is making net losses in oil marketing business so as to keep the
fuel prices affordable.
The critical point
to be noted is that under-recovery is not equal to loss for the oil companies
because they oil companies import only raw materials in the refineries to
produce various fuels like kerosene, petrol, cooking gas etc. The strange
pricing policy that is unfavorable to consumers is adopted mainly due to two
reasons. The first one is the Govt. encouraged investment in new domestic refineries.
This policy was successful in India when it was short of refining capacity and
had to import petroleum products. Now the scenario is entirely different with
many leading players like Reliance, HP, Essar and many others in the field
producing more products and exporting petrol and diesel.. This can be clearly
noticed that from that statistics, with 206 million tones in 2010-11, only 154
million tones were demanded. This clearly shows that the policy should be
revised and thus decreasing the prices.
The second reason
is it is difficult to apply the cost-plus-margin approach to each and every
product but we can use costing theory here. The scientific approach could mean
a loss of protection to oil companies but the numbers show huge profits to the
oil companies where the numbers won't dip too much for them if they adopt it.
With prices of
petroleum products raising high and with too much burden on consumers it is now
time to reassess the policies. The Government also needs to reassess its
taxation policy for petroleum products. Higher taxes on petrol are driving
consumers to diesel vehicles which in turn is increasing the subsidy burden on
the government.
Conventional
wisdom would suggest that an increase in global oil prices would hurt the oil
importing countries and, perhaps, reduce their GDP growth rates — and have the
opposite effect on oil exporters. But data for the last 15 years does not
corroborate with that claim. The five-year rolling average for crude oil prices
and growth rates of real GDP show that economic growth for the US, China, and
India — three of the top ten oil consumers — did not suffer from rising oil
prices. Nor did the economies of Saudi Arabia, Russia, and Mexico — three of
the top ten oil producers across the globe, receive an unusual lift from such a
trend. For instance, oil price increased at a higher rate in 2006 compared with
2005. Prices rose by 1.62 per cent in 2005 and 1.87 per cent in 2006. During
this period, India's real growth rate in GDP also increased from 5.61 to 6.38
per cent. This only goes to prove that oil prices are just one among many
variables which can affect a significant metric such as GDP.